In the most recent issue of the Milken Institute Review, I revisit the conservative case for deep decarbonization … and a carbon tax as the best means of getting there. While I re-plow some of the ground I covered in my 2015 paper, The Conservative Case for a Carbon Tax, I also open up new arguments about the cost-benefit case for decarbonization, the increasingly bright prospects for economically competitive low-carbon energy, the shortcomings of various alternatives to carbon taxation, and the political case for a Republican pivot away from climate denial.
The essay is a layman’s version of a more detailed study that is in the works. Comments and suggestions are welcome.
Commentary
Climate and Energy
Why the Right Should Embrace Deep Decarbonization
More in Climate and Energy
Commentary
Climate and Energy
EPA's deregulatory claim doesn't survive its own cost-benefit analysis
01 Apr 2026
Jia-Shen Tsai
Climate and Energy
Adoption Readiness Levels for energy technologies
26 Mar 2026
Niskanen Center
Studies
Climate and Energy
Next-generation geothermal power: A commercial readiness assessment
26 Mar 2026
Kenneth Sercy, Jia-Shen Tsai
Testimony
Climate and Energy
Testimony: State of the bulk power system
25 Mar 2026
Liza Reed
Commentary
Climate and Energy
Transmission is the problem. Reconductoring is part of the solution.
23 Mar 2026
Elliot Lo